ESTACADA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES

ESTACADA CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS

475 SE MAIN STREET, ESTACADA, OREGON

MONDAY, APRIL 4, 2005 - 7:00 PM

 

 

CALL TO ORDER BY PRESIDING OFFICER                                                                

 

The meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm.  Mayor Austin led in the pledge of allegiance. 

 

Present:  Cr. Marli Stauffacher, Cr. Michele Conditt, Cr. Richard Hartwig, Cr. Kay Nelson, Cr. Becky Arnold, Cr. Ben Erickson, Mayor Bob Austin, CM Randy Ealy, CP Mike McCallister, CR Denise Carey.

 

CITIZEN AND COMMUNITY GROUP COMMENTS       

 

CONSENT AGENDA                                                                                                

Approve March 14, 2004 Council minutes

Trails Inn Cafι & Timber Room OLCC License – Change of Ownership

Estacada Arts Commission appointment – Mauragrace Healey

 

Cr. Nelson moved to approve the consent agenda.  Cr. Conditt seconded the motion.  The motion passed with 6 yes and 1 abstention (Hartwig).

 

PUBLIC HEARINGS                                                                                       

 

Subdivision application #2004-3 – Ainsworth Partners – Darrow Road – 4 lots

 

Mayor Austin opened the public hearing and asked the council to declare any ex-parte contact.  There was none. 

 

CP McCallister reviewed the Planning Commission findings and recommendation of denial for this subdivision application. The main design issues with this subdivision are the size of the lots and the access roads and connectivity to other lots surrounding the subdivision.  CP McCallister stated that the applicant is in agreement with the decision to deny this application because of the design issues.  CP McCallister distributed a letter from Mr. Carl Burke regarding the drainage issues.

 

Mayor Austin read a statement regarding evidence and the right to appeal. 

 

Don Phillips, representing the applicant – Mr. Phillips concurs with staff on the recommendation of denial. 

 

There was no public input so Mayor Austin closed the public hearing.

 

Cr. Hartwig moved to deny the application as per the Planning Commission findings and recommendation.  Cr. Nelson seconded the motion.  The motion passed unanimously. 

 

Subdivision application #2004-4 – Scott Espedal – Oakview Drive – 37 lots

 

Mayor Austin opened the public hearing and asked the council to declare any ex-parte contact.  Mayor Austin stated he had talked to an individual that would be giving testimony. 

 

CP McCallister reviewed the Planning Commission findings and recommendation of approval with conditions for this subdivision application.  CP McCallister reviewed the issue of road access and connectivity with other developments in the area.  One of the main issues with the Planning Commission was the adequacy of the Oak View Drive/Carol Street access to the subdivision.  Part of the access is a 50’ right of way but a portion of it is only a 25’ right of way.  The Planning Commission added a condition that the applicant would have to improve Carol Street with a sidewalk on one side and full street improvement to the 50’ minimum.  CP McCallister stated in his opinion, this condition cannot be asked of the applicant because of the cost of the requirement.  CP distributed two handouts from the applicant offering participation in the improvement of Carol Street up to $20,000.  They would install the curb and sidewalk for $5,000 and give an additional $15,000 toward the street improvement.  CP stated that this was a fair and reasonable amount offered by the applicant.  Cr. Arnold asked if this would take care of the road.  It is staff’s opinion that this would only be a temporary fix for the road and future improvements would have to be made. 

 

Curt McLeod, engineer, stated the recommended approval would buy the city some time to fix the road.  Mr. McLeod stated that the transportation CIP should be changed to allow this access to be improved with SDC monies.  The council discussed the recommended solution to the access problem.

 

Mayor Austin read a statement regarding evidence and the right to appeal. 

 

Troy Plum, Pac West Engineering, representing the applicant – Mr. Plum stated the development of this project would help the Regan Hill Development because the sewer line would be a gravity line instead of requiring a pump station.  The applicant is willing to make improvements to Carol Street including a sidewalk. 

 

Gerald Polzin, 450 NE Carol Street – Mr. Polzin read a letter marked as exhibit 10 regarding concerns he had with the impact of traffic on Carol Street.  He would like three more conditions added – 1. any development must improve Carol and Oak View to city standards  - 2.  No connectivity with Regan Hill Development - 3.  Don’t build street stubs that connect other developments.  He also distributed some data regarding traffic levels labeled exhibit 9.

 

Troy Plum, applicant – Mr. Plum stated that the city had recommended the connectivity with the Regan Hill development and also the other stub to offer connectivity to other properties.  He also stated that a portion of Oak View is not public right of way and therefore the applicant has no way to improve this area because it is privately owned. 

 

CP McCallister addressed the connectivity and transportation issues with this development and demonstrated how all the developments in this area will connect and that there are basically only two routes off the hill – 4th Avenue and Carol Street. 

 

Mayor Austin closed the public hearing.

 

Cr. Conditt moved to approve the Planning Commission findings and recommendation amending condition #19 to include exhibits 7 and 8 as conditions of approval.  Cr. Stauffacher seconded the motion.  The Council discussed the conditions and the need to be more specific.  CP McCallister reviewed some options for the council:  one condition could be to design and construct the sidewalk, another condition could be to construct some improvement of the road equivalent to $15,000 or to bond a $15,000 improvement to add to future city money, or another alternative may be to word the condition that if the council agrees to put a portion of that road on the CIP list, offer SDC credit for anything over the first $20,000. 

 

Curt McLeod does not like the bonding option but does feel the CIP list could be changed rather quickly to allow SDCs to be used for this improvement.  He stated that one option could be to postpone the approval of the development until this were to happen. 

 

Council discussed the options.

 

Cr. Conditt amended the motion to approve the application to replace condition 19 with the requirement to have the developer engineer and construct a sidewalk along Carol Street and add condition 20 to have the developer contribute $15,000 towards the improvement of Carol Street in working with staff to determine as the best alternative to spend the money for improving Carol Street.  Cr. Arnold seconded the amendment motion.  The motion passed with 6 yes and 1 no (Nelson).

 

 The amended motion for approval passed with a vote of 6 yes and 1 no (Nelson).

 

COUNCIL BUSINESS                                                                                                        

 

Centennial Art Project – Update and discussion – Cr. Conditt met with the artist regarding the project. 

 

Mimi Near, artist, presented a model of the fountain and surrounding proposed improvements.  This includes a timeline  - a bronze strip with bronze medallions to commemorate specific dates important to the area.  The fountain will have lighting.  Cr. Conditt stated that the city had volunteered the demolition and prep of the area.  The fountain cost is covered with grant money.  Mark Davis will donate the concrete and John Wilson will donate the labor to place the concrete.  The only unfinished piece is who will place and pay for the bronze timeline and medallions, the concrete benches and a light to place by each bench.  There also needs to be a cost estimate for moving the flagpole.  It was clarified that the grant money for the project will cover the electrician cost for bringing the electricity to the fountain.

 

Cr. Conditt stated that Amy Hamilton had some concerns about the affect of the plaza with her annual Renaissance Fair celebration.  She has a large tent to erect and is concerned that the concrete pad may interfere with securing the tent.  The Council stated they did not want holes drilled in the concrete but would have staff work with Amy on securing the tent. 

 

Staff will bring detailed costs on moving the flagpole to the next meeting.  Mimi will bring detailed costs for the bronze strip, the benches and lighting for the benches.  Prep work will begin this week and concrete should be poured by next week.

 

CITIZEN AND COMMUNITY GROUP COMMENTS                                                       

 

ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING

 

          The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 pm.